Comments
“Nodes represent Twitter users, and directed edges represent retweeted posts that carry the meme. The brightness of a node indicates the activity (number of retweets) of a user, and the weight of an edge reflects the number of retweets between two users. (a) The #Japan meme shows how news about the March 2011 earthquake propagated. (b) The #GOP tag stands for the US Republican Party and as many political memes, displays a strong polarization between people with opposing views. Memes related to the “Arab Spring” and in particular the 2011 uprisings in (c) #Egypt and (d) #Syria display characteristic hub users and strong connections, respectively.”

“Nodes represent Twitter users, and directed edges represent retweeted posts that carry the meme. The brightness of a node indicates the activity (number of retweets) of a user, and the weight of an edge reflects the number of retweets between two users. (a) The #Japan meme shows how news about the March 2011 earthquake propagated. (b) The #GOP tag stands for the US Republican Party and as many political memes, displays a strong polarization between people with opposing views. Memes related to the “Arab Spring” and in particular the 2011 uprisings in (c) #Egypt and (d) #Syria display characteristic hub users and strong connections, respectively.”

Comments
Not sure which is more revealing: these recently released doodles made by Ronald Reagan at the 1981 Ottawa G7 summit (of what appear to be Dostoevsky, Butthead, a California Raisin-fied Reagan, and investigative-reporter Reagan) or these LBJ ones. Is it safe to assume Bill Clinton’s doodles were all titty-centric and shredded accordingly?

Not sure which is more revealing: these recently released doodles made by Ronald Reagan at the 1981 Ottawa G7 summit (of what appear to be Dostoevsky, Butthead, a California Raisin-fied Reagan, and investigative-reporter Reagan) or these LBJ ones. Is it safe to assume Bill Clinton’s doodles were all titty-centric and shredded accordingly?

Comments

Right around the 46 second mark Ceauşescu is dead but he doesn’t quite realize it

Bashar Assad needs to take note

Comments

Why I Feel Bad For The Atlantic

“I see John Pike as a casualty of the system, too. Our police forces have enshrined a paradigm of protest policing that turns local cops into paramilitary forces. Let’s not pretend that Pike is an independent bad actor. Too many incidents around the country attest to the widespread deployment of these tactics. If we vilify Pike, we let the institutions off way too easy.”

- excerpt from “Why I Feel Bad for the Pepper-Spraying Policeman, Lt. John Pike” by Alexis Madrigal in The Atlantic

Absolutely no one angered by this incident believes that Pike was acting in a vacuum. The above quoted article is the kind of obviousness posing as contrarianism that’s become the norm in The Atlantic’s bid to transform itself into a HuffPo-like content factory (complete with SEO juicing article title at the expense of the very officer that the author purportedly “feels bad” for). Let’s not forget that John Pike made $110,000 this year in his position as second in command of the PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS UNIT whose function is to coordinate “complaints alleged against employees and be responsible for review of police department policy. Routine review of policy must occur to ensure the department complies with current law, community needs and industry standards [and] will ensure all complaints are fairly and thoroughly investigated.” If that doesn’t sound like someone who should know better, who’s actually in a position to act independent of expected behavior, I don’t know what would. So yes, by all means, vilify this man. The Occupy movement is doing a fine job of indicting the entire system, if there’s any danger of letting institutions off too easy it comes from the watering down of politics by pageview chasing “Third Wayrags

UPDATE: a more thorough takedown 

Comments
Comments
Comments
“During World War II, the Soviet Union’s news agency, TASS, enlisted artists and writers to bolster support for the nation’s war effort. Working from Moscow, this studio produced hundreds of storefront window posters, one for nearly every day of the war. Windows on the War: Soviet TASS Posters at Home and Abroad, 1941–1945 is a monumental exhibition centered on these posters, which have not been seen in the United States since the Second World War.”
tass-posters:

KukryniksyRussian, 20th centuryThe Metamorphosis of the “Fritzes”, January 15, 1943Ne boltai! Collection

“During World War II, the Soviet Union’s news agency, TASS, enlisted artists and writers to bolster support for the nation’s war effort. Working from Moscow, this studio produced hundreds of storefront window posters, one for nearly every day of the war. Windows on the War: Soviet TASS Posters at Home and Abroad, 1941–1945 is a monumental exhibition centered on these posters, which have not been seen in the United States since the Second World War.”

tass-posters:

Kukryniksy
Russian, 20th century
The Metamorphosis of the “Fritzes”, January 15, 1943
Ne boltai! Collection

(via)
Comments

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has determined that in order to run for President he has to head off rumors that he is a homosexual. To do this, he has decided to call for national day of prayer in one of the most shameless examples of exploiting religion for political gain I have ever seen. I follow elections for the lulz so needless to say I’m excited about his potential entry into the race. 

Comments
As far as the nuclear issue is concerned, what they fear is Iran’s ability and determination that drove us into this (nuclear) path…We don’t need to build (atomic) bombs. Bombs are for retarded people. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 
Comments

Art Thoughtz: Institutional Critique 

Comments
Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur [1998]
  • Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the National Security Adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
  • Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
  • Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
  • Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
  • Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
  • Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
  • Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
  • Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
  • Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
  • Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
Comments
Comments

Word clouds based on words used in television advertisements for boys’ and girls’ toys

Comments